Home >
Library >
Federal court
>
Charles E. Austin et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Reginald Wilkinson et al.., Defendants-Appellants, Nos. 02-3429/3816; 2004 FED App. 0176P (6th Cir.), File Name: 04a0176p.06
Archival Notice
This item in our library has been archived due to its date. You have reached this
page though a link from a search engine, a different website, or from a bookmark.
You may find the information on this page to be dated or no longer available. We
are keeping it temporarily available only for archival purposes.
Charles E. Austin et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Reginald Wilkinson et al.., Defendants-Appellants, Nos. 02-3429/3816; 2004 FED App. 0176P (6th Cir.), File Name: 04a0176p.06
Publication year:
2004
| Cataloged on:
Oct. 31, 2006
ANNOTATION: The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals' Opinion regarding Ohio's Level 5/Supermax case can be accessed at this website. The Court found that the Inmates show a protected liberty interest under Sandin v. Connor (1995), in that assignment to a supermax facility results in more restrictive confinement conditions. But, the Court reversed substantive modifications to prison regulations covering the amount of drugs (contraband) an inmate may possess before qualifying for a reclassification hearing, security group activity, and retention criteria.