Archival Notice
This item in our library has been archived due to its date. You have reached this
page though a link from a search engine, a different website, or from a bookmark.
You may find the information on this page to be dated or no longer available. We
are keeping it temporarily available only for archival purposes.
Aggravated Sentencing: Blakely v. Washington: Practical Implications for State Sentencing Systems
Publication year:
2004
| Cataloged on:
Oct. 31, 2006
ANNOTATION: State sentencing systems affected by Blakely and ways to respond to Blakely and maintain judicial sentencing authority are examined. Blakely will fundamentally affect six states with presumptive sentencing guidelines systems and eight states with presumptive (non-guidelines) sentencing systems. Possibly affected by Blakely will be six states with voluntary sentencing systems and two states with presumptive sentencing guidelines in indeterminate systems. State systems may be reconciled with Blakely through the use of jury fact-finding or fully voluntary guidelines.