Home >
Library >
Constitutional legal issues
>
Chips Ahoy!: The Legal and Constitutional Implications of Involuntary Endogenous RFID Compliance Monitoring as a Condition of Federal Supervised Release
Archival Notice
This item in our library has been archived due to its date. You have reached this
page though a link from a search engine, a different website, or from a bookmark.
You may find the information on this page to be dated or no longer available. We
are keeping it temporarily available only for archival purposes.
Chips Ahoy!: The Legal and Constitutional Implications of Involuntary Endogenous RFID Compliance Monitoring as a Condition of Federal Supervised Release
Publication year:
2007
| Cataloged on:
Jan. 22, 2008
ANNOTATION: The legal use of subdermal implanted RFID (radio frequency identification) transmitters is investigated. This paper is divided into three parts: what is RFID, how do RFID implants work, and why use RFID; forced implantation could happen under existing federal sentencing law -- forced implantation could satisfy the Sentencing Reform Act and would probably not violate the Constitution; and sentencing courts should not force implantation without Congressional sanction.