Algorithms for predicting recidivism are commonly used to assess a criminal defendant’s likelihood of committing a
crime. These predictions are used in pretrial, parole, and sentencing decisions. Proponents of these systems argue that
big data and advanced machine learningmake these analysesmore accurate and less biased than humans. We show,
however, that the widely used commercial risk assessment software COMPAS is nomore accurate or fair than predictions
made by people with little or no criminal justice expertise. In addition, despite COMPAS’s collection of 137
features, the same accuracy can be achieved with a simple linear predictor with only two features.
The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism (2018)
Notice about external resources
These links are being provided as a convenience and for informational purposes only; they do not constitute an endorsement or an approval by the National Institute of Corrections (NIC) of any of the products, services or opinions of the corporation or organization or individual. NIC bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external site or for that of subsequent links. Contact the external site for answers to questions regarding its content.