This article by Judge Paul G. Cassell defends the use of victim impact statements. He argues impact statements have received widespread support because they promote justice without interfering with any legitimate interests of criminal defendants. The statements help convey valuable information to sentencing judges and have other beneficial effects. The benefits are all obtained without unfairly prejudicing defendants in any tangible way.
In Defense of Victim Impact Statements (2009)
Notice about external resources
These links are being provided as a convenience and for informational purposes only; they do not constitute an endorsement or an approval by the National Institute of Corrections (NIC) of any of the products, services or opinions of the corporation or organization or individual. NIC bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external site or for that of subsequent links. Contact the external site for answers to questions regarding its content.